<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMail is trying too hard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/</link>
	<description>Conning people into thinking I&#039;m intelligent. Since 1982.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: viperbux</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>viperbux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/archives/2005/05/10/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t say that the client had too many connections.  It simply said that there &quot;are&quot; too many connections.  It&#039;s not a gmail issue, apparently at the exact moment the mail was being delivered, lists.sourceforge.net had too many connections.

Typically, a client will repeatedly attempt to send the mail, but if after &quot;X&quot; number of attempts, and the server is STILL unavailable, it will give up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t say that the client had too many connections.  It simply said that there &#8220;are&#8221; too many connections.  It&#8217;s not a gmail issue, apparently at the exact moment the mail was being delivered, lists.sourceforge.net had too many connections.</p>
<p>Typically, a client will repeatedly attempt to send the mail, but if after &#8220;X&#8221; number of attempts, and the server is STILL unavailable, it will give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 05:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/archives/2005/05/10/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>**But** if a _single client_ has too many connections open to the same server, that _is_ the client&#039;s fault. At least, that is what I think it is, because I&#039;m not facing any problem with sourceforge lists through my yahoo account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**But** if a _single client_ has too many connections open to the same server, that _is_ the client&#8217;s fault. At least, that is what I think it is, because I&#8217;m not facing any problem with sourceforge lists through my yahoo account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 04:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/archives/2005/05/10/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>??

I still don&#039;t get it.
Let&#039;s talk about Web server. If there are too many connections open on Webserver, it would deny any new HTTP requests. It&#039;s not HTTP client&#039;s fault.

In the same way, mail server can be overloaded and it would deny any more new connections.

Btw, it&#039;s true that this is very bizarre error. I have never seen it myself in my 6.5 years of using Internet.

JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t get it.<br />
Let&#8217;s talk about Web server. If there are too many connections open on Webserver, it would deny any new HTTP requests. It&#8217;s not HTTP client&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>In the same way, mail server can be overloaded and it would deny any more new connections.</p>
<p>Btw, it&#8217;s true that this is very bizarre error. I have never seen it myself in my 6.5 years of using Internet.</p>
<p>JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/archives/2005/05/10/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Nope, read the message carefully - &quot;Too many connections **to** sourceforge&quot;.

Also, I&#039;ve **never** faced that problem in Yahoo! Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, read the message carefully &#8211; &#8220;Too many connections **to** sourceforge&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve **never** faced that problem in Yahoo! Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/archives/2005/05/10/gmail-is-trying-too-hard/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it more about lists.sourceforge.net being overloaded than GMail trying too hard? ;)

JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it more about lists.sourceforge.net being overloaded than GMail trying too hard? <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 320/321 objects using memcached

Served from: www.swaroopch.com @ 2012-02-09 13:31:58 -->
