<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Google Reader to MyAlltop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/</link>
	<description>Conning people into thinking I&#039;m intelligent. Since 1982.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122395</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122395</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Vishal Nice! It is very close to what I was looking for.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vishal Nice! It is very close to what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122281</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had written a simple application for a customizable Alltop like feed reader some time back: http://feedsrus.appspot.com/  Allows you to categorize feeds by tags too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had written a simple application for a customizable Alltop like feed reader some time back: <a href="http://feedsrus.appspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://feedsrus.appspot.com/</a>  Allows you to categorize feeds by tags too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122280</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Umang Yep. But then again, statistics are important when the topic is important (i.e. priority) and vice-versa.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Sridhar Duh, should&#039;ve searched for that. I agree this solves the unread count problem. However, the &quot;newspaper-style 3 columns&quot; is easier to read than the GReader UI where I have to click on each subscription to see what are the latest stories, it is not possible to &quot;scan&quot; GReader.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Umang Yep. But then again, statistics are important when the topic is important (i.e. priority) and vice-versa.</p>
<p>@Sridhar Duh, should&#8217;ve searched for that. I agree this solves the unread count problem. However, the &#8220;newspaper-style 3 columns&#8221; is easier to read than the GReader UI where I have to click on each subscription to see what are the latest stories, it is not possible to &#8220;scan&#8221; GReader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Iyer</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122275</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well.. I&#039;m not a big fan of this one. This so so much unorganized. I wouldn&#039;t want my all my feeds to be scattered around like that. My RSS feeds are classified into ezines, friends, blogs, finance, photography, comics, non-tech and tech feeds .. I&#039;ve implicitly attached a priority to each of those and depending on the time and interest I read those or mark them as all read even if I haven&#039;t read them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you don&#039;t want the count, there are tons of ways to avoid that: http://www.google.com/search?q=removing+the+unread+count+from+google+reader&amp;hl=en take a pick. http://userstyles.org/styles/11843  have got some good reviews.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well.. I&#8217;m not a big fan of this one. This so so much unorganized. I wouldn&#8217;t want my all my feeds to be scattered around like that. My RSS feeds are classified into ezines, friends, blogs, finance, photography, comics, non-tech and tech feeds .. I&#8217;ve implicitly attached a priority to each of those and depending on the time and interest I read those or mark them as all read even if I haven&#8217;t read them.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want the count, there are tons of ways to avoid that: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=removing+the+unread+count+from+google+reader&#038;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=removing+the+unread+count+from+google+reader&#038;hl=en</a> take a pick. <a href="http://userstyles.org/styles/11843" rel="nofollow">http://userstyles.org/styles/11843</a>  have got some good reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umang</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122265</link>
		<dc:creator>Umang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. Just hiding the unread count can make a lot of difference to how we perceive inboxes, feedreaders, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Just hiding the unread count can make a lot of difference to how we perceive inboxes, feedreaders, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122263</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Srid It does not have an unread count, that was the &quot;feature&quot; I was looking for. The point is that I do &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; want to be thorough about reading feeds, I just like to dip in occasionally to see what&#039;s happening and then quickly get out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Srid It does not have an unread count, that was the &#8220;feature&#8221; I was looking for. The point is that I do <em>not</em> want to be thorough about reading feeds, I just like to dip in occasionally to see what&#8217;s happening and then quickly get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srid</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/comment-page-1/#comment-122262</link>
		<dc:creator>srid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545#comment-122262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;does it keep track of unread/read items? this is the benefit of feed reader - one does not have to &#039;scan&#039; through the information dump in order to discover new items.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does it keep track of unread/read items? this is the benefit of feed reader &#8211; one does not have to &#8216;scan&#8217; through the information dump in order to discover new items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 350/351 objects using memcached

Served from: www.swaroopch.com @ 2012-02-09 18:56:35 -->
