<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: foss.in day 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/foss-in-day-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/foss-in-day-3/</link>
	<description>Conning people into thinking I'm intelligent. Since 1982.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pramode</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/foss-in-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/?p=397#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the GNU/Linux folks are not being stubborn or egoistic when they ask for Linux to be called that way ... it would have been good had there been some guys from the FSF to tell the audience their side of the story; I am sure a lot of us would have gone home more convinced as to why Free Software is much more about social issues than technical!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the GNU/Linux folks are not being stubborn or egoistic when they ask for Linux to be called that way &#8230; it would have been good had there been some guys from the FSF to tell the audience their side of the story; I am sure a lot of us would have gone home more convinced as to why Free Software is much more about social issues than technical!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.B. Nicholson-Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/foss-in-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>J.B. Nicholson-Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/?p=397#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So what was this argument that effectively gives Linus Torvalds near-exclusive credit for an entire operating system?  Ironic that one would defend a name even Torvalds initially believed was egomaniacial (he has since allowed interviewers to come away believing he wrote an OS, not just a part of a complete OS called a kernel).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'd be particularly interested to learn of an argument that isn't adequately addressed by http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html or http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some of Cowie's slides look suspiciously wrong, like referring to copyright infringement as theft ("Don't steal music.") conflating the philosophies of the open source and free software movements, or saying "No one can tell you no" accurately expresses software freedom.  One wonders what in Friedman's book is worth recommending, or if he's actually giving an anti-recommendation (read it to laugh at the pro-corporatist views that fail to viably address the plight of about half a billion of the poorest people in India).  But I'll withhold judgement until I've heard what he has to say.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what was this argument that effectively gives Linus Torvalds near-exclusive credit for an entire operating system?  Ironic that one would defend a name even Torvalds initially believed was egomaniacial (he has since allowed interviewers to come away believing he wrote an OS, not just a part of a complete OS called a kernel).</p>

<p>I&#8217;d be particularly interested to learn of an argument that isn&#8217;t adequately addressed by <a href="http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html</a> or <a href="http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html</a>.</p>

<p>Some of Cowie&#8217;s slides look suspiciously wrong, like referring to copyright infringement as theft (&#8221;Don&#8217;t steal music.&#8221;) conflating the philosophies of the open source and free software movements, or saying &#8220;No one can tell you no&#8221; accurately expresses software freedom.  One wonders what in Friedman&#8217;s book is worth recommending, or if he&#8217;s actually giving an anti-recommendation (read it to laugh at the pro-corporatist views that fail to viably address the plight of about half a billion of the poorest people in India).  But I&#8217;ll withhold judgement until I&#8217;ve heard what he has to say.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrepreneur Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foss.In/2005 - Day Three</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/foss-in-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrepreneur Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Foss.In/2005 - Day Three</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.info/?p=397#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Andrew Cowie&#8217;s keynote Inside &#124; Outside was amazing. I have seen the fan following Andrew created last year, and I am added to his huge fan list now! He has the right mix of technology, business and common sense. He has done work on FOSS, and advocates it with passion. I especially liked his take on &#8220;Linux&#8221; being a better way to call it, rather than &#8220;GNU/Linux&#8221;. When I heard RMS the first time, I was sold on the &#8220;GNU/Linux&#8221; argument, but when I heard Andrew&#8217;s part, I started thinking! There were so many other strong points he made (Swaroop wrote more about them), I liked the one about communicating and &#8220;not being a jerk&#8221;! I strongly suggest you to see Andrew&#8217;s presentation, and get hold of the podcast when it&#8217;s available. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew Cowie&#8217;s keynote Inside | Outside was amazing. I have seen the fan following Andrew created last year, and I am added to his huge fan list now! He has the right mix of technology, business and common sense. He has done work on FOSS, and advocates it with passion. I especially liked his take on &#8220;Linux&#8221; being a better way to call it, rather than &#8220;GNU/Linux&#8221;. When I heard RMS the first time, I was sold on the &#8220;GNU/Linux&#8221; argument, but when I heard Andrew&#8217;s part, I started thinking! There were so many other strong points he made (Swaroop wrote more about them), I liked the one about communicating and &#8220;not being a jerk&#8221;! I strongly suggest you to see Andrew&#8217;s presentation, and get hold of the podcast when it&#8217;s available. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
