Yes, I’m talking about IronPython and in this case, the company happens to be MS.

Read what Edd Dumbill has to say about it, especially this part:

Third-party patches won’t be considered until after the 1.0 release. Hugunin encourages people to be involved, but only in filing good bug reports and feature requests. And when doing this involves a .NET passport, and using the GotDotNet web forums rather than good old mailing lists, it’s a bit of a disincentive. Added to that, there’s some uncertainty about the freeness of IronPython’s license. While it looks free, it’s got the same name, “Shared Source”, as several Microsoft licenses that definitely are not free.

I have nothing more to say except that such an awesome ‘open source’ project has been effectively killed off – IronPython may go on to become 1.0 but it is now reduced to a one-man show when so many people could have contributed to it.

It’s interesting to note that the conference was held at PESIT, yep, my alma mater. We never had these kinda things w.r.t. open source when we were in college but I’m glad to see that changing!

There were interesting talks by Nat and we learnt about some cool stuff such as the Linux Desktop Testing Project – it’s amazing how the testing of GUI applications can be automated and the results verified. I must dig more deeper into it some time.

Then, of course was the presentation and demo of Beagle by Nat and John Trowbridge – this software can really change the way we use computers. I don’t think I had ever imagined searching for stuff in the computer in such a simple way. When we are searching for something, we usually know where we have to search such as in our email application or use a search engine for the internet, but to combine all of them in one is something really worth looking forward to.

At the end of that session, Nat and Trowbridge were handing over copies of Mono: A Developer’s Notebook to the first people who answered their questions. They were having a hard time thinking of a question for the last book, and so I shouted to Trowbridge, "Just give it to me!" and everyone burst laughing , then Trowbridge immediately asked who said that and just gave it to me! This was such fun and I heard people saying "Very clever…" , ok, ok, back to the book – I had looked for this book before in Book Paradise but apparently no Indian edition was available, and so I am really happy to get my hands on this book and that too directly from Nat and Trowbridge! After that, me and Uday attended the Glade session which helped me refresh my memory (I have given a talk on Glade at BLUG before!)

And I had great company throughout the day as well! A few of the BLUGgers planned to meet up at LINDEC and so that we can get to know each other (Thanks to Manish for the initiative!) this way as well. The guys who had met up were Manish, Uday, Tejaswi, Srichand, Arun, Shyam, Ashish and myself. Manish has put up some snaps as well.

Manish, yet again, took another initiative to have a BoF session today in Jayanagar but unfortunately couldn’t go coz I got to fulfill some deadlines at work, but I’ll surely make it next time.

All in all, open source and great (new) friends and Mono…. makes a great day!

If only, it worked on FreeBSD – my only gripe yet

I have just one gripe with it – if only it worked with FreeBSD…

It’s great to see new versions of MonoDevelop and Gtk# also being released. I have to check it out very soon…

One important thing to note about Longhorn is that it is completely based on .NET. All the Longhorn APIs will be in .NET and hence .NET can soon become the preferred development platform. This is my case for pushing Mono to become the preferred development platform as well since (atleast theoretically) Mono programs will be cross-platform and will run on .NET and Longhorn as well.

Coming back to Longhorn, I was reading some fascinating articles today:

• Avalon graphics model
• WinFX
• Bloghorn: A Blog Reader Built in XAML
• ObjectSpaces – a new convenient way of accessing databases
• The Official Microsoft Longhorn website
• System.Help
• Longhorn Screenshots
• Longhorn Roadmap for Avalon
• Indigo – The Longhorn Communication subsystem
• WinFS – The Longhorn Storage subsystem

I’ve been completely bowled over by all these articles. I just had to add LonghornBlogs.com to my list of feeds on my Bloglines account!

Looking from the open source angle, does Linux/FreeBSD/KDE/GNOME/…. have anything to match Longhorn? I personally feel that they can’t match Longhorn yet, maybe Mono will counter that in future but I can confidently say that only when Mono developers are innovating and not just playing catch-up with the Longhorn people. Of course, there is still time till 2006!

This reminds me of a joke I read somewhere on Slashdot:

Microsoft: Where do you want to go today?
Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
BSD (which also means OS X): Are you guys coming or what?!?

Jim Hugunin has presented a paper on IronPython at PyCon 2004. The benchmarks are amazing – IronPython runs on the JIT compiler of .Net faster than on the CPython native executable written in C!

Miguel de Icaza must be a very happy man to note that IronPython has proved that .Net is indeed usable with interpreted languages.

The combination of Python and .Net is very compelling indeed. The advantage is that you get to write powerful Python programs using the excellent .Net libraries. I cannot imagine anything more awesome than this from a Mono/.Net programmers’ point of view and all this at very good performance!!!

I can’t wait to get my hands on IronPython and play around with it!

My thoughts on the discussion… well, see my writing on Why Mono?

For me, the only thing stopping Mono from taking over the world is the legal situation, especially, vis-a-vis Microsoft. It’s sad that creating software has got more to do with lawyers than programmers now-a-days. I am keeping my fingers crossed for the results of the Novell Legal Review of Mono!