<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Swaroop C H - India, Startup, Technology, Life Skills &#187; Productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/category/self-improvement/productivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swaroopch.com</link>
	<description>Conning people into thinking I&#039;m intelligent. Since 1982.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The point of being Done</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/the-point-of-being-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/the-point-of-being-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/the-point-of-being-done/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listening to Seth Godin say &#8220;What you do for a living is not be creative, what you do is ship&#8221; reminded me of the The Cult of Done manifesto:



If you find the image inconvenient to read, here&#8217;s the text:


    There are three states of being. Not knowing, action and completion.
   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/01/quieting-the-lizard-brain.html">Seth Godin</a> say <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/5895898">&#8220;What you do for a living is not be creative, what you do is ship&#8221;</a> reminded me of the <a href="http://www.brepettis.com/blog/2009/3/3/the-cult-of-done-manifesto.html">The Cult of Done manifesto</a>:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.brepettis.com/blog/2009/3/3/the-cult-of-done-manifesto.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2804" title="The Cult of Done Manifesto" src="http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/3327763912_a9bd0e5dc1.jpg" alt="The Cult of Done Manifesto" width="386" height="500" /></a></p>

<p>If you find the image inconvenient to read, here&#8217;s the text:</p>

<ol>
    <li>There are three states of being. Not knowing, action and completion.</li>
    <li>Accept that everything is a draft. It helps to get it done.</li>
    <li>There is no editing stage.</li>
    <li>Pretending you know what you&#8217;re doing is almost the same as knowing  what you are doing, so just accept that you know what you&#8217;re doing even  if you don&#8217;t and do it.</li>
    <li>Banish procrastination. If you wait more than a week to get an idea  done, abandon it.</li>
    <li>The point of being done is not to finish but to get other things  done.</li>
    <li>Once you&#8217;re done you can throw it away.</li>
    <li>Laugh at perfection. It&#8217;s boring and keeps you from being done.</li>
    <li>People without dirty hands are wrong. Doing something makes you  right.</li>
    <li>Failure counts as done. So do mistakes.</li>
    <li>Destruction is a variant of done.</li>
    <li>If you have an idea and publish it on the internet, that counts as a  ghost of done.</li>
    <li>Done is the engine of more.</li>
</ol>

<p>My favorite is Point 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/the-point-of-being-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone for productivity</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/iphone-for-productivity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/iphone-for-productivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=2197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading the The Favorite iPhone Apps of Five Geek Rock Stars and did not find it useful, because it was mostly about games or things that apply to people only in USA. So I was wondering if I had my own list.

 Stanza 

My most favorite application is the Stanza app for reading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_favorite_iphone_apps_of_five_geek_rock_stars.php">The Favorite iPhone Apps of Five Geek Rock Stars</a> and did not find it useful, because it was mostly about games or things that apply to people only in USA. So I was wondering if I had my own list.</p>

<h3> Stanza </h3>

<p>My most favorite application is the <a href="http://www.148apps.com/reviews/stanza/">Stanza app</a> for reading ebooks.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s because of Stanza that I actually started to read more! Mostly because I can read a book anywhere and any time I want to. I also discovered some great books such as <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/2500">Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse</a> because I could explore and download in a few clicks.</p>

<h3> Maps built-in application </h3>

<p>Google started giving driving directions in India a few months back and it rocks!</p>

<h3> RunKeeper </h3>

<p>The ability to see your pace at exactly every moment during a run is very handy. And I don&#8217;t have to carry any extra device because I&#8217;m already carrying my iPhone which also happens to be my iPod which I listen to while running. And the best part of the <a href="http://www.runkeeper.com">RunKeeper Pro app</a> is that it announces by voice the distance and speed every 5 minutes which gives me the boost I need if I slowed down.</p>

<h3> RememberTheMilk and Evernote </h3>

<p>The <a href="http://www.rememberthemilk.com/services/iphone/app/">RememberTheMilk app</a> is one of the slickest iPhone apps I&#8217;ve used, but I started making daily todo lists which is a bad idea, so I wanted to think in terms of notes instead of lists, so I started using the <a href="http://www.148apps.com/reviews/evernote/">Evernote app</a> which was exactly what I was looking for.</p>

<p>The best part about Evernote is that I always have a notepad to jot things down whenever I have a thought. And after I started using Evernote, I realized this happens more often than you think! And it has gotten more useful with the <a href="http://blog.evernote.com/2009/06/17/evernote-for-iphone-3-0/">3.0 version of the app</a>. For example, imagine searching for notes by the location where you created the note! Or make voice notes. Or saving photos of an article in a magazine and searching for the text in that article inside Evernote. Or sending a link to Evernote via email. And so on.</p>

<p>There is also the official Wordpress app for writing blog posts or tinkering with drafts.</p>

<h3>MobileStudio and Dropbox</h3>

<p>Whenever I need some files that I might need to use on-the-go, I transfer it via FTP to the <a href="http://pixiotech.com/Pixio_-_en/MobileStudio.html">MobileStudio app</a> and then access it on my iPhone.</p>

<p>For example, in one incident, I was able to quickly open the tickets I had saved as a PDF on my phone since I didn&#8217;t have the actual printout.</p>

<p>Oh, and having <a href="http://www.getdropbox.com">Dropbox</a> access online via the browser means I have all my files accessible any time.</p>

<h3>TimeJot</h3>

<p>See my earlier <a href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/why-i-do-time-tracking/">time tracking</a> article.</p>

<h3>tv.burrp.com</h3>

<p>If you thought there was never interesting on TV, just visit <a href="http://tv.burrp.com">tv.burrp.com</a> and find out what&#8217;s on TV right now. It&#8217;s very very useful.</p>

<h3>burrp.com</h3>

<p>Find restaurants on-the-go. Once, a friend and myself were in Koramangala looking for a place to eat, and we discovered <a href="http://bangalore.burrp.com/listing/bars-pubs-restaurant/136218673_fiorano-ristorante">Fiorano Ristorante</a> via burrp, and had nice authentic Italian food.</p>

<h3>Reach people</h3>

<p>I never have to worry about how to reach a person any more, I have all the methods &#8211; phone call, SMS, email, Skype, IM, Twitter. You name it, we got it.</p>

<h3>TED Talks at night</h3>

<p>It&#8217;s hard to turn off the music or movie and force myself to sleep. So I end up taking my iPhone to bed and watching a <a href="http://www.ted.com">TED talk</a> or two before sleeping.</p>

<h3> Ambiance </h3>

<p>There&#8217;s actually an <a href="http://www.148apps.com/reviews/ambiance/">app for listening</a> to rain sounds or the crackling of a campfire or sounds of that sort. It comes in really handy when you just want to shut out all the noises outside and you&#8217;re not in a mood to listen to music. It gives you the background noise that you always wanted.</p>

<h3> WordBook </h3>

<p>Having a very handy <a href="http://www.freshapps.com/wordbook/">dictionary</a> on your fingertips is handy when you want to check if the word that you&#8217;re using means what you think it means.</p>

<h3> Torch </h3>

<p>Yeah, the <a href="http://www.savysoda.com/Torch/">Torch app</a> comes in handy these days because of the frequent power cuts in Bengaluru.</p>

<h3>Wishlist: ngpay</h3>

<p>The one app that is missing on the iPhone is an <a href="http://www.ngpay.com/site/services.html">ngpay</a> app. I once called up their customer support and asked if they had plans for an iPhone app and they told me that &#8220;Sorry sir, the iPhone doesn&#8217;t support third-party applications.&#8221; I was speechless.</p>

<h3>There&#8217;s an app for that</h3>

<p>There are a <a href="http://www.lifehack.org/articles/technology/7-iphone-apps-to-boost-your-productivity.html">lot</a> of <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-everything/getting-things-done.html">apps</a> out <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/08/nine-awesome-iphone-apps-for-business.php">there</a> to use.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m just glad that I finally got a kinda-PDA device that I always wanted. Now I never get bored waiting for someone because I can actually spend that time finding out the latest news and I can check Wikipedia for the members of a rock band during a discussion with friends <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/iphone-for-productivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter vs. Why we can&#8217;t concentrate?</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/twitter-vs-concentration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/twitter-vs-concentration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=2160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention Span

I started using Twitter as an experiment, and it was the first and only social network I really participated in. It was great because I actually made new friends that I went on trips with, got the opportunity to follow the thoughts of interesting people, and whenever I was in a quandary, I just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Attention Span</h3>

<p>I started <a href="http://twitter.com/swaroopch">using Twitter</a> as an experiment, and it was the first and only social network I really participated in. It was great because I actually made new friends that I went on trips with, got the opportunity to follow the thoughts of interesting people, and whenever I was in a quandary, I just had to holler a question and would get plenty of answers and advice in return.</p>

<p>But I was uneasy because I was feeling jaded. I thought it was because of the typical &#8220;overdoing it&#8221; reason, but there was more to it. <strong>It was affecting my <a href="http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2009/7/32082-are-we-losing-our-ability-to-think-critically/fulltext">ability to think critically</a>/deeply about a subject.</strong></p>

<p>Why am I thinking so much about a social network? As David Allen once said, <a href="http://www.bnet.com/2403-13242_23-254249.html">&#8220;Pay attention to what has your attention.&#8221;</a> And clearly, Twitter had more of my attention than it should have.</p>

<p>Since <strong>my attention span was reducing from books to blogs and then blogs to tweets</strong>, I was being converted from <a href="http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/m_thirunarayanan_8.html">&#8220;from a thinker to a clicker&#8221;</a>.</p>

<p>So I&#8217;ve gone back and started <a href="http://lifedev.net/2009/06/reading-makes-you-better/">reading books</a> and paying more attention to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/your_real_friends_are_your_online_friends_or_so_says_gen_y.php">offline friends</a>. And I&#8217;m not alone on this, <a href="http://emergic.org/2009/07/31/why-i-am-not-active-on-facebook-and-other-social-media/">many people</a> have expressed <a href="http://www.regator.com/blog/?p=613">similar opinions</a>.</p>

<h3>Getting your Fix</h3>

<p>I think of this situation as <em>getting your fix</em>. Think smoking vs. coffee. Both are stimulants. Both are legal. But since smoking actually affects others, people have to go outside to indulge in it. Hence, it is less convenient. Probably that&#8217;s why there are more people addicted to coffee. <em>Because it is more convenient.</em> There is a sufficient barrier to smoking. Even though this analogy may not be true, consider reading blog posts vs. reading books. There is a sufficient barrier of attention to the latter, that is why more people prefer reading blog posts. It is more convenient. The same for reading blogs vs. tweets. The latter is more convenient. Then, going down this path, your ability to think becomes restricted to 140 characters. <strong>Twitter gives you that instant high that you published or read something, which means you lose persistence which is required for longer reading, hence tend to think a lot less and quick wins prevent you from going after bigger wins.</strong></p>

<p><strong>The problem with the shorter fix is that you will <a href="http://xkcd.com/77/">indulge in it more often</a> and it will have lesser stimulation in the long run.</strong> Consider the difference between, say, having a 5-day 9-hour work week with 2-day weekends vs. having 6-hour work everyday with <em>no</em> weekend and <em>no</em> holidays. Which one would you prefer? This is how I argue that a book once in a while will give you more stimulation than a hundred tweets. For example, consider the signal-to-noise ratio &#8211; only tools like filtrr.com can filter out #ipl talk, etc. whereas a book would give a broad understanding about a particular subject. In the long run, it is more enriching to go deeper into subjects, not to be &#8220;restricted&#8221; to a buffet of subjects.</p>

<p>As a sort-of substitute for Twitter, I&#8217;ve shifted to a <a href="http://delicious.com/network/swaroopch">del.icio.us network</a>. After all, most of Twitter is sharing links and delicious doesn&#8217;t have the downside of frivolous tweets. Also, delicious shows how many people have bookmarked a link giving another indicator whether something is worth reading or not, and even better, they are tagged appropriately so I immediately know the topic to expect for an article, instead of &#8220;This is cool &lt;insert link&gt;.&#8221;</p>

<h3>The Attention Psychology</h3>

<p>Let&#8217;s think about attention in terms of psychology, which I am trying to understand a little about from <a href="http://the-mouse-trap.blogspot.com/2009/04/action-selection-and-attention.html">The Mouse Trap blog</a>:</p>

<dl>
    <dt>Maximizing utility</dt>
    <dd>
    <p>
<strong>U = E x V</strong> (where U is utility of act; E is expectancy as to whether one would be able to carry the act and if so whether the act would result in desired outcome; and V is the Value (both subjective and objective) that one has assigned to the outcome.
    </p>
    </dd>
    <dt>Maximizing Predictability</dt>
    <dd>
    <p>
While selecting an action we maximize reward and minimize punishment, basically we choose the maximal utility function; while choosing which stimuli to attend to we maximize our foreknowledge of the world and minimize surprises, basically we choose the maximal predictability function; we can even write an equivalent mathematical formula: Predictability <strong>P = E x R</strong> where P is the increase in predictability due to attending to stimulus 1 ; E is probability that stimulus 1 correctly leads to prediction of stimulus 2; and R is the Relevance of stimulus 2(information) to us. Thus the stimulus one would attend, is the one that leads to maximum gain in predictability. Also, similar to the general energy level of organism that would bias as to whether, and how much, the organism acts or not; there is a general arousal level of the organism that biases whether and how much it would attend to stimuli.
    </p>
    </dd>
</dl>

<p>As per my understanding, the first part means that because we <em>expect</em> much utility about something, it&#8217;s perceived <em>utility</em> is higher, making it&#8217;s <em>value</em> higher. And because Twitter gives that dash of randomness that we desire, it&#8217;s utility is much higher than it really is.</p>

<p>The second part means that we want to know more about the world in order to have lesser surprises, and hence we tend to read more and more, especially if it is information that we perceive as relevant to us.</p>

<p>Bottom line: I question whether more and more information and more and more immediacy is really necessary/required for us?</p>

<p>Think of all the great things that have been achieved whether it is a motor engine or a music stereo, would it have been created if the to-be-creator was constantly distracted and with low attention span? Where is the time to get <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009/08/09/write-when-inspired/">inspired</a> if we&#8217;re always mentally tired?</p>

<h3>Why Can&#8217;t We Concentrate?</h3>

<p>I will finish up with excerpts from <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/04/29/rapt/print.html">this excellent article on Salon called &#8220;Why Can&#8217;t We Concentrate?&#8221;</a>:</p>

<p><span id="more-2160"></span></p>

<blockquote>
    <p>
    Here&#8217;s a fail-safe topic when making conversation with everyone from cab drivers to grad students to cousins in the construction trade: Mention the fact that you&#8217;re finding it harder and harder to concentrate lately. The complaint appears to be universal, yet everyone blames it on some personal factor: having a baby, starting a new job, turning 50, having to use a Blackberry for work, getting on Facebook, and so on. Even more pervasive than Betty Friedan&#8217;s famous <a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/leadership/Pdf/TheProblemThatHasNoName.pdf">problem that has no name,&#8221;</a> this creeping distractibility and the technology that presumably causes it has inspired such cris de coeur as Nicholas Carr&#8217;s much-discussed <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">Is Google Making Us Stupid?&#8221;</a> essay for the Atlantic Monthly and diatribes like &#8220;The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future,&#8221; a book published last year by Mark Bauerlein.
    </p>

    <p>
    You don&#8217;t have to agree that &#8220;we&#8221; are getting stupider, or that today&#8217;s youth are going to hell in a handbasket (by gum!) to mourn the withering away of the ability to think about one thing for a prolonged period of time. Carr (whose argument was grievously mislabeled by the Atlantic&#8217;s headline writers as a salvo against the ubiquitous search engine) reported feeling the change &#8220;most strongly&#8221; while he was reading. <strong>&#8220;Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy,&#8221; he wrote. &#8220;Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do.</strong> I feel as if I&#8217;m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text.&#8221; For my own part, I now find it challenging to sit still on my sofa through the length of a feature film. The urge to, for example, jump up and check the IMDB filmography of a supporting actor is well-nigh irresistible, and once I&#8217;m at the computer, why not check e-mail? Most of the time, I&#8217;ll wind up pausing the DVD player before the end of the movie and telling myself I&#8217;ll watch the rest tomorrow.
    </p>

    <p>
    &#8230; What this commonplace crisis comes down to is our inability to control our own minds. You may, like Traister, need to buckle down and write, or you may, like Carr, pine for the deeply engaged style of reading we bring to books and New Yorker profiles. You may, like me, realize that your evening will be more enjoyable and more enriching if you commit to the full 110 minutes of &#8220;Children of Men&#8221; instead of obsessively checking out your friends&#8217; Facebook updates or surveying borderline illiterate reader reviews &#8212; or, for that matter, browsing through the &#8220;Seinfeld&#8221; reruns in your Tivo Suggestions queue. <strong>In many cases, the thing we wish we would do is not only more interesting but ultimately more <em>fun</em> than the things we do instead, and yet it seems to require a Herculean effort to make ourselves do it.</strong>
    </p>

    <p>
    What to do? For most people, bailing on the Web or e-mail or cellphones isn&#8217;t even feasible, let alone practical or ultimately desirable. (I shudder at the thought of living without my beloved Tivo.) Besides, modern life really <em>isn&#8217;t</em> making us stupider: IQ tests have to be regularly updated to make them harder; otherwise the average score would have climbed 3 percent per decade since the early 1930s. (The average score is supposed to remain at a constant 100 points.) And IQ measures problem-solving ability, rather than sheer data retained, which has grown even faster over the same interval. Each of us knows many more people and facts than our counterparts of 100 years ago; it&#8217;s just that the importance of those people and facts remains somewhat uncertain. Knowing a little bit about Lindsay Lohan and Simon Cowell (two people I recognize despite having no active interest in either one) can&#8217;t really be equated with knowing a bit about Marie Curie or Lord Mountbatten. <strong>We have more information, but it isn&#8217;t necessarily more <em>valuable</em> information.</strong>
    </p>

    <p>
    Winifred Gallagher&#8217;s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FRapt-Attention-Focused-Winifred-Gallagher%2Fdp%2F1594202109&#038;tag=saloncom08-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325%20&#038;lid=amazonpurchase&#038;lpos=text">Rapt: Attention and the Focused Life</a>  argues that it&#8217;s high time we take more deliberate control of this stuff. &#8220;The skillful management of attention,&#8221; she writes, &#8220;is the sine qua non of the good life and the key to improving virtually every aspect of your experience, from mood to productivity to relationships.&#8221; Because we can only attend to a tiny portion of the sensory cacophony around us, the elements we choose to focus on &#8212; the very stuff of our reality &#8212; is a creation, adeptly edited, providing us with a workable but highly selective version of the world and our own existence. <strong>Your very self, &#8220;stored in your memory,&#8221; is the product of what you pay attention to, since you can&#8217;t remember what you never noticed to begin with.</strong>
    </p>

    <p>
    &#8230; Gallagher deserves credit for calling our attention to attention itself, specifically to the way it works neurologically. In essence, attention is the faculty by which the mind selects and then zeroes in on the most &#8220;salient&#8221; aspect of any situation. The problem is that the brain is not a unified whole, but a collection of &#8220;systems&#8221; that often come into conflict with each other. When that happens, <strong>the more primitive, stimulus-driven, unconscious systems (the &#8220;reactive&#8221; and &#8220;behavioral&#8221; components of our brains) will usually override the consciously controlled &#8220;reflective&#8221; mind.</strong>
    </p>

</blockquote>

<p>If you&#8217;ve read so far, thanks, because you&#8217;re one of the few people who still have a healthy attention span. Half of the people who didn&#8217;t read probably found it &#8220;too boring&#8221; (which means it exceeded their attention span) and the other half didn&#8217;t read it because there were no bullet points or pictures.</p>

<p>BUT I&#8217;m still not saying that you should give up Twitter, you just have got to be careful on how you use it (duh!). All you have to do is just remember when was the last time you read a whole book <a href="http://twitter.com/abdulqabiz/status/3308690148">every time you tweet</a> <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/twitter-vs-concentration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I do Time Tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/why-i-do-time-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/why-i-do-time-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Idea

A couple of months ago, I was going through a &#8220;productivity drought.&#8221; I used to repeatedly bounce between tasks. I couldn&#8217;t concentrate enough. Work was suffering.

I thought to myself &#8220;Just how bad is the situation? Can I quantify it?&#8221; Then I started using a very old and boring concept: the stop watch.

Only that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The Idea</h3>

<p>A couple of months ago, I was going through a &#8220;productivity drought.&#8221; I used to repeatedly bounce between tasks. I couldn&#8217;t concentrate enough. Work was suffering.</p>

<p>I thought to myself &#8220;Just how bad is the situation? Can I quantify it?&#8221; Then I started using a very old and boring concept: <strong>the stop watch</strong>.</p>

<p>Only that I used an iPhone application called <a href="http://niftybrick.com">TimeJot</a> which is specifically a time journalling application meant for this purpose.</p>

<p>The idea was pretty simple:</p>

<ol>
<li>Have 5-7 different categories of projects and actions that I normally engage in. Everything else is not considered productive time.

<ul>
<li>&#8220;Projects and actions&#8221; are defined as anything that needs to be done, whether at office or home.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Every time I start on one of these activities, start the timer.</li>
<li>Every time I get distracted or switch to something that is not part of the task at hand, I stop the timer.</li>
<li>The most important thing is to keep the timer sacred. It is <em>okay</em> to be not productive, but it is <em>not okay</em> to lie to yourself. If the timer is on, you are working with full focus on the task at hand. If the timer is off, you&#8217;re on a break, do whatever you want.</li>
</ol>

<h3>The Results</h3>

<p>I have been following these 4 simple steps and I have learned a lot about myself and it has had a profound effect on my productivity:</p>

<ol class="long">
<li>
Realization of how many <strong><a href="http://xkcd.com/477/">context switches</a></strong> I do per day! Because I have to stop the timer every time I get distracted, it became really clear on how many times I started switching browser windows! Now, I have (almost) stopped reading tech news websites during work hours and certainly stopped twittering.
</li>
<li>
I started analyzing and experimenting on how to increase the number of productive hours. One of the best things that worked for me was the <strong>switch off WiFi during the first two hours of work everyday</strong>. Once I disconnect myself from the global consciousness, I tend to focus on the task at hand. Once in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)">the flow</a>, it is not easy to lose that focus. So switching on WiFi access (which is of course required for regular work) later is okay.
</li>
<li>
Now that I had the data, I realized how much I&#8217;m glued to the computer. So I started <strong><a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2009/04/07/restricting-yourself/">restricting</a> myself on weekends to spend less time in front of the computer</strong> and more time doing other activities. This resulted in two things: (1) Spending lesser number of hours at the computer but more focused hours and (2) Finally getting around to the big pile of books that are waiting to be read.
</li>
<li>
Realizing that I&#8217;m <strong>not investing time in learning new things</strong> at all.
</li>
<li>
Realizing that I <strong>waste too much time pondering and not enough time doing</strong>. But again, what is needed is moderation not elimination. It is these ponderings that round up my thinking and learning, after all.
</li>
<li>
Realizing that I am <strong>more productive if I wake up early</strong> but I just love being a night-owl. A hard problem to solve.
</li>
<li>
Learning that I work best when there are <strong>big chunks of work as opposed to many small things</strong>.
</li>
<li>
Learning that when I focus, I really really focus. But getting to that point is difficult. An important aspect to know about oneself, because once I <strong>started accepting that there is a warmup period of several days before I really become productive with a new task</strong>, I was fighting myself a little lesser and going with the flow.
</li>
<li>
I count <strong>exercise time also as productive time</strong>, so on the days that I cycle to work, I get a bonus one hour of productivity that day and I feel good! And this has the side-effect of encouraging me to go for running and cycling which has drastically gone down these days.
</li>
<li>
The data provided a stark picture on <strong>how much time I spend on non-important things</strong> and I started ruthlessly cutting down on all the distractions. And I could prove to myself that I was successful in this initiative only from the data.
</li>
</ol>

<p>That&#8217;s a lot of things that can be learned about yourself with a simple stop watch <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<h3>It&#8217;s Not <em>That</em> Crazy</h3>

<p>If you think it is crazy to be doing this, then did you know that <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/20090601/the-way-i-work-matt-mullenweg_Printer_Friendly.html">Matt Mullenweg, the founder of WordPress</a> does time tracking as well?:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>&#8220;One of my favorite programs that we didn&#8217;t make is Rescue Time. It runs in the corner of my computer and tracks how much time I spend on different things. I realized that even though I was doing e-mail only a couple of minutes at a time, it was adding up to a couple of hours a day. So I&#8217;m trying to reduce that. I have a WordPress plug-in that filters all my messages based on the sender&#8217;s e-mail address &#8212; so high-priority e-mails go into one folder and the rest go into others. Tim Ferriss, who wrote The 4-Hour Work Week, advocates checking e-mail twice a week, but that is too severe for me. Instead, I&#8217;m trying to implement Leo Babauta&#8217;s approach from The Power of Less. He suggests small steps, like checking e-mail five times a day instead of 10. It&#8217;s like dieting: People who binge diet gain it all back. That happens to me with e-mail.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p><span id="more-2043"></span></p>

<p>On the other extreme is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/business/24collins.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">Jim Collins, a business-books author</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
Mr. Collins keeps this short list: <br />
Creative 53% <br />
Teaching 28% <br />
Other 19% <br />
<p>
That, he explains, is a running tally of how he’s spending his time, and whether he’s sticking to <strong>a big goal he set for himself years ago: to spend 50 percent of his workdays on creative pursuits like research and writing books, 30 percent on teaching-related activities, and 20 percent on all the other things he has to do.</strong>
</p>
<p>
These aren’t ballpark guesstimates. Mr. Collins, who is 51, <em>keeps a stopwatch with three separate timers in his pocket at all times, stopping and starting them as he switches activities. Then he regularly logs the times into a spreadsheet.</em>
</p>
<p>
<strong>He has a good jump, too, on another overarching goal he’s set for himself: to produce a lasting and distinctive body of work.</strong>
<p>
</p>
Within the sprawling and overpopulated world of self-styled gurus dispensing advice on management and leadership, Mr. Collins is in rare company. <em>His last two books — “Built to Last” and “Good to Great” — were breakout hits, selling about seven million copies combined.</em>
</p>
<p>
&#8230;
</p>
<p>
PART of the Jim Collins method borrows from other hypersuccessful people. He approaches every aspect of his life with purpose and intensity.
</p>
<p>
&#8230;
</p>
<p>
Oh, he sleeps with vigor, too. He figures that he needs to get 70 to 75 hours of sleep every 10 days, and once went to a sleep lab to learn more about his own patterns. Now — surprise, surprise — he logs his time spent on a pillow, naps included, and monitors a rolling average.
</p>
<p>
“If I start falling below that,” he says, pointing to the short list on his whiteboard, “I can still teach and do ‘other,’ but I can’t create.” 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The whole article is worth reading. The premise of all this is that <a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2009/01/15/you-only-know-what-you-measure/">you only know what you measure</a>.</p>

<!--
And the same applies for personal finance : http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2009/05/25/the-boat-experience-the-means-justify-the-ends/
-->

<h3>Tools</h3>

<p>If you&#8217;re convinced that time tracking is something you can try out (why not do a <a href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/04/30-days-to-success/">30-day trial</a>?), then here are some tools that I&#8217;ve come across:</p>

<ul>
<li>For all platforms: <a href="http://klok.mcgraphix.com/klok/index.htm">Klok</a> (needs Adobe AIR)</li>
<li>For Linux command-line folks: <a href="http://bitbucket.org/trevor/timebook/wiki/Home">TimeBook</a></li>
<li>For GNOME users: <a href="http://www.gnomejournal.org/article/73/tracking-your-time-with-project-hamster">Project Hamster</a></li>
</ul>

<p>I prefer to use the TimeJot app on my iPhone because my time tracking tool is independent of whether the task is at the computer or not. I have tried only a few of the above tools listed, so I can&#8217;t vouch for how good they are.</p>

<h3>What Next?</h3>

<p>I&#8217;m still debating with myself on whether time tracking is something that I should do in the long term, or should I do just enough to understand my productive patterns and then throw away the time-tracking tool. Then again, that depends on how much self-discipline I build up. Let&#8217;s see how it goes.</p>

<h3>Nike Plus</h3>

<p>I will end my thoughts with an excerpt from an interesting <a href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/17-07/lbnp_nike?currentPage=all">article from Wired on the Nike Plus</a>, a gadget that runners can use to track their running statistics:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>
&#8230; But then something weird happened. The lighting was cut back to normal &#8230; and productivity still went up. In fact, just about every change the company made had only one effect: increased worker productivity. After months of tinkering, the work conditions were returned to the original state, and workers built more relays than they did in the exact same circumstances at the start of the experiment.
</p>
<p>
What was happening? Why was it that no matter what the Hawthorne plant managers did, the workers just performed better? Researchers puzzled over the results, and some still doubt the details of the experiment&#8217;s protocols. But the study gave rise to what&#8217;s known in sociology as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect">the Hawthorne effect</a>.
</p>
<p>
<em>The gist of the idea is that people change their behavior—often for the better—when they are being observed (which is why it&#8217;s sometimes called the observer effect). Those workers at Western Electric didn&#8217;t build more relays because there was more or less light or because they had more or fewer breaks. The Hawthorne effect posits that they built more relays simply because they knew someone was keeping track of how many relays they built.</em>
</p>
<p>
<strong>When you lace up your running shoes outfitted with the Nike+ sensor and fire up your iPod, you&#8217;re both the researcher and the subject—a self-contained experimental system. And what you&#8217;re likely to find is that the Hawthorne effect kicks in. You&#8217;re actively observing yourself, and just that fact not only provides information you can act on but also may modify your behavior. That&#8217;s the power of Living by Numbers.</strong>
</p>
<p>
Keeping track of our lives is nothing new. Athletes have kept training logs to quantify and analyze their workouts. Counting calories has long been a popular and effective way to lose weight.
</p>
<p>
In the past, that required two steps. First, there was the recording of the information, then the actual effort to modify behavior. In study after study, this extra work turned out to be a huge burden. Compliance fell, and the outcome suffered: People would stop monitoring their caloric intake, fail to change it, and fail to lose weight. Make the data-gathering easy and you remove one of the barriers to meaningful improvement in our lives.
</p>
<p>
With Nike+ and other tools, that first step has become almost effortless. Dieters don&#8217;t have to calculate the caloric content of meals manually; they can just log in to FitDay.com to enter the information in an online food diary. Keeping a training log doesn&#8217;t mean busting out a pen and paper at the end of a run. It&#8217;s as simple as listening to music on an iPod while exercising.
</p>
<p>
&#8230;
</p>
<p>
<strong>But the power of self-tracking is even more profound. It&#8217;s not just that collecting this data can help us change our behavior all on its own. Using the immensely powerful tools now becoming available, we can set up positive feedback loops: We keep track of something, see how the data matches up with what we&#8217;d like to have happen, and then use that knowledge to modify our actions.</strong>
</p>
<p>
The effect of feedback on attempts to change behavior is well established. A 2001 study in the American Journal of Health Behavior showed that personalized feedback increased the effectiveness of everything from smoking-cessation programs to interventions for problem drinkers to exercise programs. <strong>Feedback is important and powerful; it works.</strong>
</p>
<p>
That feedback can be internal, too, because when we start to do things to make ourselves more healthy, our bodies react. When obese people lose as little as 7 percent of their body weight, the levels of adiponectin in their blood goes up—reducing their risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Or consider the five-run threshold that Nike has seen in the data. It might be that runners not only like the information they get; they might be getting positive feedback from their body after five runs as well.
</p>
<p>
Think of it this way: It used to be that to lose weight, you&#8217;d keep a diary of everything you ate. Stepping on a scale is easy enough and gives one data point—about the system&#8217;s output, not its inputs. But develop a system that allows you to track not only your weight but also what you eat, how you exercise, even how you&#8217;re feeling, and suddenly you can start to pull things together. You can see how all those variables interact and then put that information to use.
</p>
<p>
<strong>We tend to think of our physical selves as a system that&#8217;s simply too complex to comprehend. But what we&#8217;ve learned from companies like Google is that if you can collect enough data, there&#8217;s no need for a grand theory to explain a phenomenon. You can observe it all through the numbers. Everything is data. You are your data, and once you understand that data, you can act on it.</strong>
</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/why-i-do-time-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chunking</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/chunking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/chunking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a typical day of someone who sent this to Caterina Fake:



This style of working is explained further in &#8220;Don&#8217;t Multi-task When You Can Use Chunking&#8221;.

What does your day look like?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a typical day of <ins>someone who sent this to</ins> <a href="http://www.caterina.net">Caterina Fake</a>:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/caterina/3270176074/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/3270176074_202951a8de.jpg?v=0" alt="Single-tasking by Caterina Fake" title="Single-tasking by Caterina Fake" width="375" height="500"/></a></p>

<p>This style of working is explained further in <a href="http://management.about.com/od/yourself/a/chunking1106.htm">&#8220;Don&#8217;t Multi-task When You Can Use Chunking&#8221;</a>.</p>

<p>What does <em>your</em> day look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/chunking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Google Reader to MyAlltop</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About six months ago, I had stopped reading all RSS feeds because I wasn&#8217;t managing my information input well. Over the past few months I was slowly creeping back into the same RSS habit and I didn&#8217;t like it.

The biggest problem for me was seeing that unread count number*. It was intimidating and I quickly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About six months ago, I had stopped reading all RSS feeds because I wasn&#8217;t managing my information input well. Over the past few months I was slowly creeping back into the same RSS habit and I didn&#8217;t like it.</p>

<p>The biggest problem for me was seeing that unread count number<sup>*</sup>. It was intimidating and I quickly started procrastinating reading the articles, which was ironic, because we mostly read RSS feeds to procrastinate from doing real work <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>I thought to myself: &#8220;There must be a way to list all my favorite blogs and websites, I can add them and forget about it. Whenever I want to get updated, I just visit the page and read all the latest, and then go away again. There is no need to keep memory of how much I read and how much I did not read.&#8221;</p>

<p>I started looking at <a href="http://my.yahoo.com">My Yahoo!</a> to list the websites I follow. It allows to add RSS feeds and will show you the latest 5 posts from that RSS feed. But then, <a href="http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2009/03/myalltop-opens.html">MyAlltop</a> came along and solved it more elegantly for me:</p>

<ul>
<li>MyAllTop is easy to scan, i.e., read because of the newspaper-style 3 columns of blocks, compared to My Yahoo!&#8217;s big horizontal blocks (maybe there&#8217;s a way to get the layout of your liking, but I couldn&#8217;t find it).</li>
<li>When you mouseover a link in Alltop/MyAlltop, it will show a few paragraphs from the article which makes it easy to discern whether the title is misleading or if the article is really interesting.</li>
<li>The Alltop directory is very useful (which reminds me of the origins of Yahoo! &#8211; a directory of websites) in finding the best blogs on a particular topic, which is a harder problem than I imagined. I don&#8217;t know if Google Reader&#8217;s &#8220;bundles&#8221; had solved this problem, but I definitely find this a good resource.</li>
<li>I used to regularly visit <a href="http://india.alltop.com">india.alltop.com</a> to read the latest news but used to get annoyed by irrelevant-to-me blocks. Now I can just add the ones that I&#8217;m interested in to MyAlltop page.</li>
</ul>

<p>In the end, I&#8217;ve switched from Google Reader to <strong><a href="http://my.alltop.com/swaroopch">my.alltop.com/swaroopch</a></strong> and I&#8217;m finding it far more fun to read this way. This is also useful if you ever wondered what blogs I read, it&#8217;s all in <a href="http://my.alltop.com/swaroopch">one page</a>.</p>

<p>If you have any other &#8220;How to control your information input&#8221; tips, please comment.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p><sup>*</sup> And if you wondered that I must be nuts to get bogged down by the unread count number, let me tell you that I&#8217;m not nuts, I&#8217;m actually a <a href="http://www.inboxzero.com">Inbox Zero freak</a>. I tend to reach inbox zero on email every week regularly. If only I could say the same about my todo list&#8230;</p>

<p><br />
<br /></p>

<p><strong>Update on June 13, 2009</strong>: I wanted to try a new idea &#8211; to randomly see the list of feeds every time, so I ditched MyAllTop and wrote a <a href="http://www.swaroopch.com/world.html">small html file</a> that uses Google AJAX Feeds API to display the feeds list. Let&#8217;s see how this experiment goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/from-google-reader-to-myalltop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get into the Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/get-into-the-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/get-into-the-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big question that keeps coming up for an attention-deficit person like me is &#8220;How do you get into the flow?&#8221;

There are two things that work for me and I find them at loggerheads against each other. The problem is that it has been difficult to stick to either of them.

One is called being a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big question that keeps coming up for an attention-deficit person like me is &#8220;How do you get into the flow?&#8221;</p>

<p>There are two things that work for me and I find them at loggerheads against each other. The problem is that it has been difficult to stick to either of them.</p>

<p>One is called being a night-owl, the other is called the MIT factor.</p>

<p>I love to <strong>work late nights</strong>. Life is completely undisturbed, you&#8217;re not going to get phone calls, there are no noises, nobody&#8217;s expecting email replies from you, nobody around to disturb you. All good.</p>

<p>But being nocturnal ain’t easy. Your whole life is thrown off-balance as well as your body&#8217;s natural cycle. Yet some of the best hackers I know are night-owls. They hack away their code and leave the rest to management. I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s a viable option for us in a startup where we do everything including working with many partner companies. Besides,  I don’t wish it to go to such depths of imbalance, for example, I want to maintain my regular running but it is not possible when you wake up late. And running in the evenings on Bengaluru roads is defined as insanity. The struggle is <strong>productivity/flow vs. life balance</strong>.</p>

<p>The second is called &#8220;The MIT Factor.&#8221; <strong>Do the Most Important Task first thing in the morning</strong>. It&#8217;s that simple. Don&#8217;t think about what&#8217;s ahead in the day, don&#8217;t think about what bills are pending, don&#8217;t think about planning to reach office on time (just have a fixed deadline when you have to start getting ready and think no more about it). Just switch on your computer or take out your pen and paper as soon as you wake up and start working on it. The important thing is <strong>Don&#8217;t think. Just start working on it.</strong></p>

<p>The problem with the second option is that if you don&#8217;t wake up early, you again end up in the daily grind where you may not get focus. And you need to have the discipline to immediately start working. Whatever you do at the start of the day sets the mood for the rest of the day. For example, you check email first thing in the morning? You&#8217;ll tend to do the same activity for the rest of the day.</p>

<p>The bottom line is I think there is a psychological concept where you have to <strong>load the entire problem, the entire domain on what you&#8217;re working on into your head and that takes time, say 15-20 minutes</strong> and then you suddenly start solving problems. <em>But if you subconsciously know that you&#8217;ll get disturbed any time in those 15-20 minutes, the brain almost gives up</em> and doesn&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth putting in that investment to get into the flow if it is going to ultimately get disturbed. Is this true? I have no idea, just a theory that I&#8217;m beginning to believe (I can&#8217;t remember if I read this somewhere or just an opinion I&#8217;m forming for myself).</p>

<p>I wonder how other people approach this concept of &#8220;getting into the zone.&#8221;</p>

<p>Further reading:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_%28psychology%29">Flow in Psychology as defined by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/time-management/geek-to-live--control-your-workday-187074.php">Geek to Live: Control your workday by Gina Trapani</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/distraction.html">Disconnecting Distraction by Paul Graham</a> &#8211; I&#8217;ve been applying some of the ideas here and so far I&#8217;ve had good success.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/ff_wozniak?currentPage=all">Want to Remember Everything You&#8217;ll Ever Learn? Surrender to This Algorithm</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/get-into-the-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;My Online Life&#8221; in Mint</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/my-online-life-in-mint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/my-online-life-in-mint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A list of blogs I read has been published in the Mint Lounge newspaper on 13-Dec-2008 Saturday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- http://www.flickr.com/photos/swaroop/3103391629/ -->
<a href="http://epaper.livemint.com/Articletext.aspx?article=13_12_2008_140_002&#038;mode=1" title="My Online Life, in Mint Lounge"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3034/3103391629_05ab335826.jpg" width="500" height="222" alt="My Online Life, in Mint Lounge" /></a></p>

<p>A list of blogs I read has been published in the Mint Lounge newspaper on 13-Dec-2008 Saturday.
<a href="http://www.livemint.com/2008/12/13001727/Saving-time-and-money.html">Read it online on the Mint website</a> or in the <a href="http://epaper.livemint.com/Articletext.aspx?article=13_12_2008_140_002&amp;mode=1">epaper section</a>.</p>

<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.livemint.com/articles/Authors.aspx?author=Sidin%20Vadukut&amp;type=wa">Sidin</a> for asking me to write this and publishing it in Mint.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, as typical of newspapers, my words were modified to something that is newspaper-y which is really not my style, and the article was printed before I got a chance to review. And no, that short bio was <em>not</em> written by me <img src='http://www.swaroopch.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><span id="more-1116"></span></p>

<p>Here is the full content of the article:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>I am a utility reader and writer. If it doesn’t make you think, I don’t read or write it. If I need entertainment, I go for movies or listen to music. It follows that I have an interest in personal improvement and productivity. Hence I tend to visit websites and blogs of that nature. Some of my favourites:</p>

<h2>Personal Finance</h2>

<h3><a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com">www.thesimpledollar.com</a></h3>

<p>On his website, Trent Hamm talks about improving your personal finances. Hamm also writes detailed reviews of books related to both personal finance and entrepreneurship/self-improvement. The site hosts a number of downloadable books such as 31 Days To Fix Your Finances and quirky tips to save money by making your own bread and detergent! A must-read.</p>

<h3><a href="http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com">www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com</a></h3>

<p>Ramit Sethi’s blog is US-centric but there are a lot of tips and discussions on how to be prudent with money and personal finance planning. In addition to blogposts, the Stanford graduate and start-up entrepreneur has newsletters and video interviews that will help budding entrepreneurs and those looking to save a little extra.</p>

<h2>Productivity</h2>

<h3><a href="http://www.lifehacker.com">www.lifehacker.com</a></h3>

<p>Technology should help you lead a better life rather than make you use more technology. And this is the website that shows how to use technology. 
Part of the popular Gawker blog network, Lifehacker has advice and tips on saving time. Look for links to great Windows, Mac and Linux applications that help you do just that. It’s all about the blog’s official motto: Don’t live to geek; geek to live.</p>

<h3><a href="http://www.calnewport.com/blog/">www.calnewport.com/blog/</a></h3>

<p>Called the “Study Hacks” blog Newport writes about the productivity hacks he uses and how to become a better student. Although meant for students, we can all use the advice here because today’s jobs require us to continuously learn and improve our skills.</p>

<h2>Design</h2>

<h3><a href="http://www.yankodesign.com">www.yankodesign.com</a></h3>

<p>A website which highlights fresh and new ideas from all over the world. Very inspiring. Shows that the world is not limited in ideas but in people who can bring these ideas to life. Great for industrial design buffs, geeks and fans of great photography.</p>

<h2>Marketing</h2>

<h3><a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com">sethgodin.typepad.com</a></h3>

<p>Seth Godin is now an Internet phenomenon. His insightful blog, among the most popular on the Web, focuses on many aspects of running a business and creating products and how they affect the brand and marketing.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p><em>Swaroop C.H. is the author of two open source textbooks on Python and Vim 7. He is also co-founder of Ionlab</em> (www.ionlab.in), <em>a geeky product design and marketing firm. He blogs at http://www.swaroopch.com/posts.</em></p>

<p>Write to lounge@livemint.com</p>

</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/my-online-life-in-mint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Fresh Graduates Can Grow</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/how-fresh-graduates-can-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/how-fresh-graduates-can-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a small experiment, I had put up a skribit sidebar where anybody can suggest what I can write about. Little did I know that it would actually be used seriously. Someone posted the topic &#8220;On how fresh graduates can learn independently and grow. Instead of waiting for the Company to help&#8221; and today, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a small experiment, I had put up a <a href="http://www.swaroopch.com/posts/#skribit">skribit sidebar</a> where anybody can suggest what I can write about. Little did I know that it would actually be used seriously. Someone posted the topic <em>&#8220;On how fresh graduates can learn independently and grow. Instead of waiting for the Company to help&#8221;</em> and today, there are 9 votes on it!</p>

<p>To be honest, I think I am not qualified enough to answer this question. I am certainly no role model. But since 9 people have voted on it, I feel obliged to write something useful. I have jotted down some thoughts on what ideas and habits have helped me, it may not necessarily be useful for everyone. I hope these fresh graduates who voted will pick the best ideas and habits suited for them.</p>

<h3>Character and Lifestyle</h3>

<p>Instead of focusing on building a career, why not focus on building a character? The career will take care of itself.</p>

<ul>
<li>&#8220;Sow an act&#8230; reap a habit; Sow a habit&#8230; reap a character; Sow a character&#8230; reap a destiny.&#8221; &#8211; George Dana Boardman</li>
<li>As <a href="http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/05/21/the-most-important-piece-of-career-advice-you-probably-never-heard/">Cal Newport</a> would say, &#8220;Fix the lifestyle you want. Then work backwards from there.&#8221; &#8230; Too often, we <a href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/articles/the-medium-vs-the-message.htm">confuse the medium</a> (lawyer, doctor, engineer, etc.) with the message (what is important to us, what we want to do). So it&#8217;s far more important to figure out what you want out of life, then figure out how to achieve that rather than the other way around. And only you can figure this out for yourself.</li>
<li>I would recommend reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0684802031?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=swchthdr-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0684802031">First Things First by Stephen Covey</a> to help you understand your priorities in life.</li>
<li>Most important of all, find your inner peace. Remember that &#8220;Satisfaction is within.&#8221;</li>
</ul>

<h3>Career Building</h3>

<p>Basically, you need to take initiative in what you want to achieve, no one can tell you what you have to do, life is not that simple. I&#8217;m glad the original question poser said that he/she wanted to grow &#8220;Instead of waiting for the Company to help&#8221;, you&#8217;ve got that part right already.</p>

<p>I recommend reading:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/10/the-pmarca-guid.html">The Pmarca Guide to Career Planning, part 2: Skills and education</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/career-advice/">Career Advice presentation by Garr Reynolds</a></li>
<li><a href="http://aaronsw.jottit.com/howtoget">How To Get A Job Like Mine by Aaron Swartz</a></li>
</ul>

<h3>Get Results</h3>

<ul>
<li>&#8220;Results, Jay. Results. Otherwise you can&#8217;t expect rewards.&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Vertigo&#8221; novel, by Ashok Banker</li>
<li><a href="http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/11/07/does-being-exceptional-require-an-exceptional-amount-of-work/">Do deliberative practice</a>, not just &#8220;a lot of work.&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.norvig.com/21-days.html">Stick to the 10-year plan</a>. There are no shortcuts to success.</li>
</ul>

<p>Ultimately, you need to take action and get results. It&#8217;s not enough to just plan and hope. As Morpheus would say, &#8220;There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.&#8221;</p>

<h3>Read</h3>

<p>My personal slogan is &#8220;I read. Therefore I do. Therefore I am.&#8221; If I compare myself to my school days and today, there has been a major transformation in character and outlook, and I attribute that purely to reading.</p>

<p>A great part of my learning also comes from writing, hence the blog, wiki, books, and twitter. It might seem like a waste of time, but I learn more by communicating. But that&#8217;s just me.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.joshwhitford.com/2008/03/01/postcard-from-warren-buffett/">Read, Read, Read</a>, the single advice given by Warren Buffett (one of the world&#8217;s richest men)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/12/06/fifteen-tactics-for-maximizing-your-investment-in-reading-for-personal-growth/">Tactics For Reading, by Trent Hamm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://calnewport.com/blog/?p=213">25 Articles Every Student Should Read</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2008/10/30/is-reading-making-you-stupid/">For every hour that you read, you must gain 3 hours of experience &#8211; Scott H Young</a></li>
</ul>

<p>If you don&#8217;t know where to start, I would suggest <a href="http://personalmba.com/best-business-books/">The Personal MBA Reading List</a>.</p>

<h3>Friends</h3>

<p>Make valuable friends. This is the most important tip I can ever give you.</p>

<p>Equally important, <a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2008/09/18/friends-and-goals/">make the right kind of friends</a>. Yes, it&#8217;s tough to let go of friends who you intuitively know are not the right influence on you, but speaking from experience, it is worth it in the long run.</p>

<p>As a wise man once said, &#8220;Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are.&#8221;</p>

<h3>Learn Your Trade</h3>

<p>For example, if we are talking about a software engineer:</p>

<ul>
<li>Debugging is the most important skill, <em>not</em> coding. I wish I had known this when I was in college.</li>
<li>Reading is a great habit that has a side-effect that you will also have the ability to read a lot of code and build up the structure inside your head about how the code works, just like you have to imagine what is written in a book or novel.</li>
</ul>

<p>I also recommend reading:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://samizdat.mines.edu/howto/HowToBeAProgrammer.html">How To Be a Programmer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lethain.com/entry/2008/nov/06/you-only-learn-the-first-time/">Do Side projects</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gist.github.com/6443">Keep Learning</a></li>
</ul>

<p>If you are looking for more in-depth knowledge, I would recommend taking a look at <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/131571/recommended-books-for-software-engineering">this Stack Overflow discussion</a>.</p>

<h3>Make A Difference</h3>

<p>Consider this excerpt from <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_46/b4108053865815_page_2.htm">a Business Week article</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>One vocal camp even maintains that the repetitive nature of writing software code has corrupted Bangalore&#8217;s intellectual spirit. &#8220;These 20-year-olds are like coolies, doing the same job over and over,&#8221; says CNR Rao, a Bangalorean scientist who has been an adviser to the Indian government for decades. The software industry, he says, has turned the city into a glorified sweatshop. &#8220;Where is the innovation?&#8221; he asks. &#8220;How does this contribute to anything but greed and commerce?&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The joy of programming is the joy of building and creating something. Wouldn&#8217;t it be amazing if we can build and create something useful for other people? If yes, why aren&#8217;t we doing more of that? After all, there is no dearth of things that we can create.</p>

<h3>Closing Statement</h3>

<p>Hopefully, I have given some food for thought here.</p>

<p>If this article was useful, please feel free to post suggestions on what I can write about on <a href="http://skribit.com/blogs/swaroop-c-h-the-dreamer-india-life-technology">my skribit page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/how-fresh-graduates-can-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Specialization vs Generalization</title>
		<link>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/specialization-vs-generalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/specialization-vs-generalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/specialization-vs-generalization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been pondering about specialization vs. generalization in terms of career skills.

I have this notion that I <em>should</em> be a maven, <em>should</em> be an expert at something. But yet, I mostly do things that are the very opposite of this idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been pondering about specialization vs. generalization in terms of career skills.</p>

<p>I have this notion that I <em>should</em> be a maven, <em>should</em> be an expert at something. But yet, I mostly do things that are the very opposite of this idea.</p>

<p>Since I don&#8217;t tend to be a specialist, I tend to not focus on a particular topic. I want to learn about different things and hence I tend to meet people of varied interests, and consequently end up being excited about a lot of different ideas. For example, one of my good friends is someone who I happened to meet on a bus because my seat was next to his, and we talked non-stop for 5 hours from the moment we said &#8216;Hello&#8217;. I was able to connect with him well because I knew a bit about his profession and we had some common terminology right at the beginning of the conversation. And I really love having such conversations. It&#8217;s one of the things that really motivate me and it ends up throwing me in different directions.</p>

<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not really a generalization vs. specialization debate, and more of an attitude. Then again, I see that people tend to really pigeonhole themselves, such as &#8220;I&#8217;m looking for C++ jobs&#8221; or &#8220;I want only bluetooth jobs&#8221;. Why? Because they&#8217;ll get experience in a particular technology and employers will give higher pay packages to specialists. This means these people focus only on things related to that one particular area and ignore everything else. Somehow I&#8217;ve been unable to do this, even though I want to.</p>

<p>As <a href="http://sivers.org/tim-ferriss">Tim Ferriss puts it</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>&#8220;<em>Most people avoid certain actions because they view changes as permanent. If you make a change, can you go back to doing it like you did before?</em> You can always reclaim your current state in most cases. If I quit my job in industry x to test my artistic abilities in a different industry, worst case scenario, can I go back to my previous industry? Yes. Recognize that <em>you can test-drive and micro-test things over brief periods of time</em>. You can usually reclaim the workaholism that you currently experience if you so decide to go back to it.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This kind of sums up what I&#8217;ve been doing in the past six months &#8211; test-driving things over brief periods of time, trying my hand at different things.</p>

<p>Yesterday, I needed some inspiration, so I ended up listening to one of my favorite podcast talks &#8211; Jason Fried on <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail471.html">&#8220;Lessons learned from building Basecamp&#8221;</a> (<a href="http://cycle-gap.blogspot.com/2005/10/37-signals-way.html">transcript</a>). A few things that he said made a lot of sense, not only in terms of software, but also in terms of career:</p>

<ol>
<li>Reduce mass

<ul>
<li>Enable change. Enable speed.</li>
<li>Do not worry about what may be needed 8 months down the lane.</li>
<li>Make just-in-time decisions, when you have the data.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Every decision is temporary.

<ul>
<li>If it is too costly to change, it&#8217;s probably wrong.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Getting Real

<ul>
<li>Design the interface first.</li>
<li>This is the same as <a href="http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/05/21/the-most-important-piece-of-career-advice-you-probably-never-heard/">Cal Newport</a> saying &#8220;Fix the lifestyle you want. Then work backwards from there.&#8221;</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Iterate. Start small. Make your first version half a product, not a half-assed product.

<ul>
<li>Do a 30-day trial of things, such as your decisions of trying something new, etc.</li>
<li>But do the basics and do them well. For example, if you want to start a blog, don&#8217;t expect 1000 readers overnight, work at writing 5 good articles instead.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>There are so many more ideas that could be applied including the concept of publicity amplifiers, transparency and trust, blogging, etc.</li>
</ol>

<p>It&#8217;s funny that a methodology for software can be used for lifehacking.</p>

<p>Of course, it&#8217;s not just software programmers who <a href="http://www.madprops.org/blog/specialization-vs-generalization/">have this debate</a>, even <a href="http://www.studio469.com/blog/2006/12/design-profession-specialization-vs-generalization.htm">designers</a> and <a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/02/07/skill-generalizing/">productivity</a> <a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/02/08/specializing-vs-generalizing/">specialists</a> do.</p>

<p>Later, I realized that another way of looking at this is <a href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/07/21/push-vs-pull-processes/">&#8220;doing as much as required, no more&#8221;</a>. Why is this important? Because <em>results matter more than &#8220;expertise&#8221;</em>. I had an Aha! moment. Suddenly, I feel less guilty and more positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swaroopch.com/blog/specialization-vs-generalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
